Google Indexing Millions of Bing Image Results

A few months back Google accused Bing for stealing their search results, but now search engine round table reported that Google is indexing about 8 million of Bing image thumbnail results. This issue was first posted by loupiote in Google webmaster forum, he said, when he tried to solve the issue of hotlinking his photo by a content farm site (gasta.co) from bing image results, surprisingly he found millions of Bing cache thumbnail images indexed by Google.

Do read – ALT guide for Image Optimization.

bing cache results

I think this is a small error from Google because they are not copying the results directly, they just indexed the hot linked images from Bing search results, so the fault is on the content farm sites. We had already discussed about why indexing images of a tech blog is dangerous as it may harm your bandwidth of the server.

Now the problem has been solved by Google, search now for Bing cache image you can see only few images on results.

About sudharsan

I'm the Founder & Editor-in-chief of Technoskillonline. I'm a great fan of Internet and blogging stuffs, so i like to share the things which i know to make it better than before.
This entry was posted in SEO tips and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Google Indexing Millions of Bing Image Results

  1. Google highjacking bing. lol

  2. Paul Salmon says:

    So basically, Google provided results from hotlinked images in content farms? I thought the last update was supposed to eliminate those, or was that only for the search results and not the images?

    • sudharsan says:

      Google frequently updates their algorithm to prevent those spams but to be frank, its a very tough job to monitor million of blogs around web.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>